Adopting Fama-French 5-Factors for Investment Strategy Success

Image: Freepik / rawpixel.com

The Fama-French 5 factors model is a financial model developed by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French in the early 1990s to explain the returns of different asset classes. The model proposes that returns can be attributed to five key factors: market beta, size, value, profitability, and investment.

The model is rooted in the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which posits that the expected return of a security is a function of its beta or sensitivity to the market. However, Fama and French argue that the CAPM is incomplete and that additional factors are needed to explain the returns of different asset classes.

The first factor, market beta, is the same as in the CAPM and measures the sensitivity of a security's returns to the overall market. A beta of 1 implies that a security's returns are in line with the market, whereas a beta value over 1 and a value below 1 denote higher and lower volatility, respectively.

The second factor, size, captures the performance of smaller companies versus larger ones. Smaller companies are generally considered to be riskier, so they tend to have higher returns. This factor is measured by market capitalization.

The third factor, value, looks at the performance of cheaper (value) stocks versus more expensive (growth) ones. Value stocks tend to be undervalued by the market and have lower price-to-earnings ratios. This factor is measured by the book-to-market ratio.

The fourth factor, profitability, measures the performance of companies with high profitability (measured by earnings or cash flow) versus those with low profitability. Companies with high profitability tend to have higher returns. This factor is measured by the earning-to-price ratio or return-on-equity.

The fifth factor, investment, looks at the performance of companies with high levels of investment (measured by capital expenditures or research and development) versus those with low levels of investment. Companies with high levels of investment tend to have lower returns. This factor is measured by capital expenditures or research and development as a percentage of assets.

The Fama-French 5 factors model is widely used in the field of finance and has been shown to have strong explanatory power for the returns of different asset classes. However, it's important to note that some other models and theories also try to explain the returns of different asset classes and it's important to evaluate their own limitations and assumptions.

It's also noteworthy that the Fama-French 5-factor model is not a trading strategy or a guide for stock picking, but rather a model for understanding and explaining the returns of different assets. The factors themselves are not predictable, and the model does not offer any guarantee of future performance.

Step 1: Gathering data

Sources of data for the Fama-French 5 factors

To calculate the Fama-French 5 factors, data on market returns, size (market capitalization), value (price-to-book ratio), profitability (earnings-to-price ratio or return on equity), and investment (capital expenditures or research and development as a percentage of assets) is needed. There are a few different sources for this data, including financial databases and online tools.

• Financial databases: The most common source of data for the Fama-French 5 factors is financial databases such as the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) or the Worldscope database. These databases provide historical price and return data for a wide range of securities, and are widely used by researchers and practitioners.
• Online tools: Another option for obtaining data for the Fama-French 5 factors is to use an online tool or service that calculates the factors for you. For example, the Fama-French 5 factors Model from our Portfolio Optimizer is a great tool that allows users to calculate the factors for a given portfolio.

To calculate the Fama-French 5 factors, clean, accurate, and reliable data must be used. Additionally, the data used should be appropriate for the particular analysis and inquiries being made.

Additionally, it's important to consider the limitations of the data sources. For example, some financial databases may not have complete coverage of all securities, and some online tools may not provide the same level of granularity as financial databases.

The Fama-French 5 factors are reliable in explaining the cross-section of returns in other nations and regions as well, but it's important to take the unique characteristics of each market or region into account when using the model and the data. This is because the Fama-French 5 factors were developed using US data.

How to calculate the factors

Once data on market returns, size, value, profitability, and investment has been gathered, the next step is to calculate the factor exposures for each security in your portfolio. There are a few different methods for doing this, including regression analysis and calculating the average factor exposures for each asset class.

• Regression analysis: One common method for calculating the factor exposures is to use regression analysis. This method involves regressing the returns of each security on the returns of the market, the size factor, the value factor, the profitability factor, and the investment factor. The coefficients of the regression are the factor exposures for each security. This method allows for a more detailed and accurate analysis of the factor exposures of each security.
• Calculating the average factor exposures: Another method is to calculate the average factor exposures for each asset class. This method involves grouping the securities in your portfolio into different asset classes, such as large-cap stocks or small-cap value stocks, and then calculating the average factor exposures for each asset class. This method is simpler and less detailed than regression analysis, but it can still provide a good overview of the factor exposures of your portfolio.

It's crucial to keep in mind that each of these approaches has its own presumptions and restrictions, including those related to the data's time frame, level of detail, and method for calculating factor exposures.

Additionally, it's also important to consider the robustness of the results when selecting the methodology. For example, the regression analysis method may be more robust as it allows for a more detailed and accurate analysis of the factor exposures of each security, but it also assumes that the returns of each security can be explained by a linear combination of the market, size, value, profitability and investment factors. Other methods such as principal component analysis can also be used to calculate the factor exposures, but they have their assumptions and limitations.

Once the factor exposures have been calculated, it's important to examine them to determine whether your portfolio is more or less exposed to certain factors than the market or benchmark. For example, if your portfolio has a higher exposure to the value factor than the market, it may indicate that your portfolio has a higher weighting in value stocks.

The Fama-French 5 criteria are neither independent of one another nor mutually exclusive, which is another crucial point to remember. Therefore, rather than examining each factor exposure separately, it's crucial to consider them all together.
(nextPage)

Step 2: Analyzing the data

Interpreting the factor exposures of your portfolio

Once the factor exposures of your portfolio have been calculated, it is important to interpret them to understand how your portfolio is exposed to the market, size, value, profitability, and investment factors.

• Market beta: The market beta factor exposure tells us how sensitive the portfolio is to overall market movements. A beta of 1 indicates that the portfolio's returns are in line with the market, while a beta above 1 suggests higher volatility and a beta below 1 indicates lower volatility. A higher market beta than the benchmark implies that the portfolio is more volatile than the benchmark and a lower market beta implies the opposite.
• Size: The size factor exposure tells us how the portfolio is exposed to smaller companies versus larger ones. A positive size factor exposure indicates that the portfolio has a higher weighting in small-cap stocks, while a negative size factor exposure indicates a higher weighting in large-cap stocks. A positive size factor exposure implies that the portfolio's returns are positively correlated with the size factor and a negative size factor exposure implies the opposite.
• Value: The value factor exposure tells us how the portfolio is exposed to value stocks versus growth stocks. A positive value factor exposure indicates that the portfolio has a higher weighting in value stocks, while a negative value factor exposure indicates a higher weighting in growth stocks. A positive value factor exposure implies that the portfolio's returns are positively correlated with the value factor and a negative value factor exposure implies the opposite.
• Profitability: The profitability factor exposure tells us how the portfolio is exposed to companies with high profitability versus those with low profitability. A positive profitability factor exposure indicates that the portfolio has a higher weighting in companies with high profitability, while a negative profitability factor exposure indicates a higher weighting in companies with low profitability. A positive profitability factor exposure implies that the portfolio's returns are positively correlated with the profitability factor and a negative profitability factor exposure implies the opposite.
• Investment: The investment factor exposure tells us how the portfolio is exposed to companies with high levels of investment versus those with low levels of investment. A positive investment factor exposure indicates that the portfolio has a higher weighting in companies with high levels of investment, while a negative investment factor exposure indicates a higher weighting in companies with low levels of investment. A positive investment factor exposure implies that the portfolio's returns are negatively correlated with the investment factor and a negative investment factor exposure implies the opposite.

The factor exposures should be taken into account along with other information about the portfolio, such as the overall asset allocation, the specific securities owned, and the investment objectives and risk tolerance of the portfolio, and are not necessarily indicative of future performance. The fact that the factor exposures might fluctuate over time and should be routinely checked and assessed is also vital to keep in mind.

Comparing your portfolio to the market or a benchmark

Once the factor exposures of your portfolio have been calculated, it can be informative to compare them to the factor exposures of the market or a benchmark. This can provide insight into how your portfolio differs from the market or benchmark in terms of its exposures to the market, size, value, profitability, and investment factors.

One way to compare your portfolio to the market or a benchmark is to calculate the tracking error, which is a measure of how closely the returns of your portfolio follow the returns of the market or benchmark. The tracking error is calculated as the standard deviation of the difference between the returns of your portfolio and the returns of the market or benchmark. A lower tracking error indicates that your portfolio's returns are more closely aligned with the market or benchmark, while a higher tracking error indicates that your portfolio's returns deviate more from the market or benchmark.

Another way to compare your portfolio to the market or a benchmark is to calculate the information ratio, which is a measure of the portfolio's excess returns per unit of risk relative to the market or benchmark. The information ratio is calculated as the portfolio's excess returns divided by the tracking error. A higher information ratio indicates that the portfolio is generating higher returns per unit of risk relative to the market or benchmark.

While comparing your portfolio to the market or a benchmark can be instructive, it's also crucial to take other aspects into account, such as the investment objectives and risk tolerance of the portfolio, as well as the overall asset allocation and specific securities owned. The performance of the portfolio's factors and factor exposures should be regularly evaluated and analyzed because they can alter over time.

Step 3: Implementing changes to your portfolio

Options for adjusting your portfolio based on the Fama-French 5 factors

An investor may decide to modify their portfolio to better suit their investment goals and risk tolerance after calculating the factor exposures of their holdings and comparing them to the market or a benchmark. There are a few different options for adjusting a portfolio based on the Fama-French 5 factors.

• Tilting: One option is to tilt the portfolio towards or away from certain factors. For example, if an investor wants to increase their exposure to the value factor, they may choose to invest more in value stocks and less in growth stocks. Similarly, if an investor wants to decrease their exposure to the market beta factor, they may choose to invest more in low-beta stocks and less in high-beta stocks.
• Factor investing: Another option is to invest directly in factors through the use of factor-based ETFs or mutual funds. This approach allows investors to gain exposure to a specific factor or combination of factors, and to adjust their portfolio's factor exposures in a more precise and targeted way.
• Smart beta: Smart beta strategies are a form of factor investing that involves the use of rules-based methodologies to select securities for inclusion in a portfolio. This approach allows investors to gain exposure to a specific factor or combination of factors, and to adjust their portfolio's factor exposures in a more precise and targeted way.

The fact that each of these possibilities has its own presumptions, restrictions, and potential risks should be noted. For instance, tilting the portfolio in one direction or another may increase the portfolio's overall risk, while factor investing and smart beta techniques may each carry their own unique dangers. The performance of the portfolio's factors and factor exposures should be regularly evaluated and analyzed because they can alter over time.

Considerations for rebalancing your portfolio

Rebalancing a portfolio refers to the process of bringing the portfolio back to its original asset allocation by buying or selling assets as needed. Rebalancing a portfolio based on the Fama-French 5 factors can be a useful strategy to maintain a portfolio's factor exposures over time.

• Timing: One consideration for rebalancing a portfolio is timing. For example, an investor may choose to rebalance their portfolio on a regular schedule, such as quarterly or annually, or they may choose to rebalance their portfolio when certain thresholds have been breached, such as when the portfolio deviates from its target factor exposures by a certain percentage.
• Transaction costs: Another consideration for rebalancing a portfolio is transaction costs. Rebalancing a portfolio may involve buying or selling assets, which can result in costs such as trading fees or taxes. These costs should be taken into account when deciding when and how to rebalance a portfolio.
• Tax implications: Additionally, it's important to consider the tax implications when rebalancing a portfolio. Selling assets that have appreciated in value can trigger capital gains taxes, and this should be considered when deciding whether to sell a security.
• Long-term vs short-term strategy: It's also important to consider whether the rebalancing strategy is more oriented to the short-term or the long-term. For example, a short-term strategy may focus on adjusting the portfolio to take advantage of market conditions, while a long-term strategy may focus on maintaining the portfolio's factor exposures over a longer period.
• Risk management: Another important consideration when rebalancing a portfolio is the risk management aspect of it, the portfolio may become too concentrated in one or more factors and this could entail higher risk. It's important to consider the overall risk of the portfolio and make adjustments accordingly.

In summary, rebalancing a portfolio based on the Fama-French 5 factors can be a useful strategy to maintain a portfolio's factor exposures over time. However, there are several considerations to take into account when rebalancing a portfolio, such as timing, transaction costs, tax implications, long-term vs short-term strategy, and risk management. It's important to weigh these considerations and make decisions that align with the investment objectives and risk tolerance of the portfolio.

Step 4: Ongoing monitoring and review

How often to review your portfolio's factor exposures

It's important to regularly review your portfolio's factor exposures to ensure that they align with your investment objectives and risk tolerance, and to make adjustments as needed. The frequency of these reviews will depend on the specific goals of the portfolio and the investor's risk tolerance and investment horizon.

• Short-term investment horizon: For investors with a short-term investment horizon, it may be appropriate to review the portfolio's factor exposures on a more frequent basis, such as monthly or quarterly. This allows investors to make adjustments to the portfolio in response to changes in market conditions or to take advantage of short-term opportunities.
• Long-term investment horizon: For investors with a long-term investment horizon, it may be appropriate to review the portfolio's factor exposures on a less frequent basis, such as annually or semi-annually. This allows investors to maintain a long-term perspective and to make adjustments to the portfolio more deliberately and strategically.
• Active management vs passive management: It's also important to consider the management style of the portfolio, an actively managed portfolio may need more frequent reviews than a passively managed portfolio.
• Changes in portfolio factor exposures: It's also important to consider any significant changes in the portfolio's factor exposures, if there's a significant deviation from the target factor exposures, it may be appropriate to review the portfolio more frequently.

In conclusion, the frequency with which a portfolio's factor exposures are reviewed will be determined by the portfolio's specific goals, the investor's risk tolerance and investment horizon, management style, and any significant changes in the portfolio's factor exposures. It is critical to review the portfolio's factor exposures regularly to ensure that they align with the investment objectives and risk tolerance, and to make any necessary adjustments.

Adjusting your investment strategy based on changes in the factors

As the market and the economy change, the factor exposures of a portfolio may also change. It's important to regularly monitor the factor exposures and adjust the investment strategy as needed to ensure that the portfolio aligns with the investment objectives and risk tolerance.

• Rebalancing: One way to adjust the investment strategy based on changes in the factors is to rebalance the portfolio. For example, if the value factor exposure of the portfolio has increased, an investor may choose to sell some value stocks and invest in other types of stocks to bring the portfolio back to its target factor exposures.
• Re-evaluating the benchmark: Another way to adjust the investment strategy based on changes in the factors is to re-evaluate the benchmark against which the portfolio is measured. For example, if the portfolio's factor exposures have changed, it may be appropriate to use a benchmark that better reflects the portfolio's current factor exposures.
• Re-evaluating the investment objectives: Changes in the factors may also warrant re-evaluating the investment objectives and risk tolerance. For example, if the investment objectives or risk tolerance of the investor changes, the portfolio's target factor exposures may also change.
• Factor-based investing: another way to adjust the investment strategy based on changes in the factors is to invest in factor-based products such as ETFs or mutual funds that track a specific factor or a combination of factors. This approach allows investors to gain exposure to a specific factor or combination of factors, and to adjust their portfolio's factor exposures in a more precise and targeted way.

The investment strategy should be adjusted wisely and systematically in response to changes in the factors, taking into account the overall risk and return of the portfolio as well as the investor's investment goals and risk tolerance.

Additionally, It's important to remember that the market and the economy are constantly changing, and the factor exposures of a portfolio may change as well. Therefore, it's important to regularly monitor the factor exposures and adjust the investment strategy as needed to ensure that the portfolio aligns with the investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Conclusion

Potential benefits of using the model in your investments

The Fama-French 5 factors model is a widely used framework for understanding the sources of returns in the equity market. Using this model in your investments can provide several potential benefits.

• Improved portfolio performance: By understanding the factors that drive returns in the equity market, investors can use the Fama-French 5 factors model to construct portfolios that are more likely to generate higher returns or outperform a benchmark.
• Better risk-adjusted returns: By considering the factor exposures of a portfolio, investors can also use the Fama-French 5 factors model to construct portfolios that have a better trade-off between risk and return. For example, by tilting a portfolio towards the value factor, an investor may be able to achieve higher returns while taking on less risk.
• Improved diversification: By understanding the factor exposures of a portfolio, investors can also use the Fama-French 5 factors model to improve diversification. For example, by investing in a portfolio that has a high exposure to the value factor, an investor can achieve better diversification by investing in a different set of stocks than a portfolio that has a high exposure to the growth factor.
• Better understanding of the market: By understanding the factors that drive returns in the equity market, investors can use the Fama-French 5 factors model to better understand the market and to make more informed investment decisions.
• Better alignment with investment objectives: By understanding the factor exposures of a portfolio, investors can use the Fama-French 5 factors model to ensure that the portfolio aligns with their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Understanding the origins of returns in the stock market can be done using the Fama-French 5 factors model, and like every investing strategy, it has its own limitations and hazards. The factor exposures and portfolio performance should also be taken into account as they are subject to change over time and should be checked and assessed regularly.